About thecovertcode

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far thecovertcode has created 93 blog entries.

Remarketing Stories

By |2024-09-24T21:02:20+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

Once, while I was on vacation in Alaska, I had a dream that one of my accounts was overspending. I wrote to the team to check on our babies, and yes, one account had spent far over our budget in just a few days. The culprit was the in-app mobile campaign. I immediately paused everything. I contacted Criteo and once again had to prove that I had not turned on full targeting—why would I? Out of my 20+ accounts, none had that setting on, and it had been almost a full year of running ads with the same budget spent month over month. Why would I suddenly break out and decide to triple my spend on a network that I knew didn’t work? I first made that mistake a few years prior, and lessons were learned. Criteo and I went back and forth, sending analytics reports showing that the traffic didn’t match, then saying that they would investigate it. Finally, after 6 weeks, they agreed to give me partial credit, but the experience was disappointing. What a gigantic waste of time and money for everyone. Meanwhile, I switched back to AdRoll, which, don’t get me wrong, is a great service, but unlike Criteo, you can’t bid by CPC but rather set a target spend for how much you are willing to pay for a CPC or eCPM. The results? A campaign typically costs three times more with poorer results. 

All things considered, I have nothing but respect for AdRoll. It was June of 2019, and a few months before I found Criteo, I launched a fundraising campaign for my local pro-bono Boys & Girls Club of Hawaii. I logged in and almost fainted. The campaign cost was $9,000, which was $7,750 more than was approved. How could this have happened? I reviewed the account and noticed they charged us $163 per CMP, but my max range was $15 (and even that was considered aggressive). My heart was pounding when I jumped on chat. The result was 100% full credit back to my account. That’s support you can count on. That being said, flash forward to today: AdRoll will not promise or deliver credits and will only promise to stay within your daily budget, and the costs have skyrocketed with diminishing returns. 

Bottomline: media partners need to take ownership of their roles. Glitches happen, and people also make mistakes, but we’re in it together and must be able to trust each other. Moreover, I mentioned the dangers of setting up and forgetting your accounts. Optimization must be a daily practice in digital advertising. Proof that impressions ran and invalid click reports are a must as well, but it goes beyond that. If we’re so smart, then when spending trends break radically, wouldn’t it make sense to hit the pause button and make sure it was intentional? And when an error does occur, let’s not be afraid to fix it. Call it a media mulligan, and then let’s make sure that it doesn’t happen again. That’s when everyone benefits. I frequently consider how many businesses are suffering from poor account management, either internally or by media partners and agencies who rely solely on the system to make automatic bids for them. Believe me, there is nothing Smart about that! Agency best practices demand manual bidding and full control of the spend on the account.

Social Media: Extended

By |2024-09-24T21:02:20+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

In the beginning, it was all about showing up. It was easy for brands, public figures, and individuals to reach the masses and gain followers by simply signing up, sharing content, and creating opportunities to engage. The cost is nothing but your time and commitment. It worked like that for years. The rule of thumb was that the more you posted, the more your content would show to your “active audience,” which is defined as your friends/fans who like, comment, share, watch, or flash forward to the NOW, hovering over your content for several seconds during a scroll.

During the early adopter phase, Facebook’s mission was to grow subscribers and garner as many minutes of their daily screen time as possible. It’s no different than any media network; they needed lots of eyeballs and a commitment that they would be back, where the platform could then operate as an advertising space. They had to generate enough data to prove to the media industry that they were a valuable part of the media mix and worthy of reallocating marketing funds from other channels or spending more on this emerging media.  

To reduce the barrier to entry and speed up adoption, Facebook made users’ accounts free. Then, to create the buzz, you had to be invited to sign up for an account by a current subscriber. This wasn’t MySpace; not just anyone made the cut; it was uber cool. They had the perfect distribution network: college kids. It spread like wildfire. I got my first introduction to the platform in 2008 from my best friend, Hillary Steen, while on a summer holiday in Sweden. She was shocked that I hadn’t heard about it, “Girl, really? It’s been out for a couple of years,” she said while logging on. I hovered over her shoulder and she said, “I just need to check my profile quickly before we go out. My sister said she was going to write,” I was intrigued. Hillary invited me later that day, and within minutes, I had set up a profile and was quickly a fan. I couldn’t believe how many familiar names were already engaging in the virtual space. The friend requests piled in, and with each new connection, there was a rush. It was so easy and fun — I knew it would be big. 

When I returned to Hawaii, I pitched it to Paul Brown, and he agreed that we should start a company page. I posted content promoting the icon “Look for us on Facebook” on ads and in-store signage. Organically, we started to grow our following as the platform gained popularity. And then, for the next decade, it was pretty much the same rodeo. The changes came in sweeps or little bursts of new features and enhancements. 

The first change that really impacted the agency was when Facebook distinguished between an individual and a business account. If you had more than 5,000 friends, you were not allowed to have an individual account; you had to switch to a business account, and then those friends became fans and did not require approval to subscribe to your content. It seemed better at the time and less work for the team because we didn’t have to accept hundreds of requests manually. All that was required to engage with a brand or public figure was to follow them. No invitation request or action needed. The only problem was that they made it very hard (near impossible) to convert your account from individual to business. For years, the agency had to set up new profiles for clients, which came with heartache, especially when the profile had a healthy number of followers and a vanity url (i.e., instead of facebook.com/somelongnumberoflettersandnumbers, it was facebook.com/yourcompanyname). 

Anna’s Tip: Make sure you are creating a business profile and then set your vanity domain; you can only change it once.   

It was a constant battle for years where new clients were unable to access their accounts or migrate from individual to new business accounts. That’s why, when you search for a company’s brand name, sometimes more than one profile pops up. Sometimes it’s them, or other times it’s someone from a personal account who claims the name. 

Then the content delivery strategy changed, marking another significant change for advertisers on the platform. As Facebook subscribers grew rapidly, the platform had to figure out a way to ensure customers spent more screen time on the site. To do this, they curated content so that during each session, users would see the content they cared about and were not flooded with posts that were irrelevant, resulting in an exit. Too many bad sessions, and you’d stop coming altogether. They couldn’t risk that. 

We learned that there are several types of users: content creators, sharers, and consumers. Most users, 80% or more, are what we affectionately refer to as Stalkers, and they rarely, if ever, generate or share content. They are just there to watch (yes, it’s a little creepy). Our next group is the oversharers. They want to participate, but their lives are not that exciting, and instead of posting a picture of themselves doing laundry or eating the same lunch again, they share fun twerking videos or other clips and articles on their feed to show their network that they are exciting humans. Then we have our true content creators—individuals, brands, and public figures. In the beginning, when there wasn’t that much unique content, it was easier to reach your friends or fans because Facebook needed to fill the scroll and there were fewer overall choices. Back then, we identified that if you posted 4-6 times a day, you could reach 26% of your active audience on each post. The average Facebook user visited the platform 8 times a day (mostly from their phones), and an average session was 12–15 scrolls. 

That math was valuable to us, and thus our agency’s social strategy was to grow our following so that we could reach more people organically with our daily content, sometimes even reposting the same body copy with different images during the day to maximize reach. We then allocated media spend toward getting more fans and assumed if we posted enough content, we would reach that 26% of our audience daily. So, we targeted our ads to the existing following, their friends, or new audiences based on geo-location, demographics, and interests, with the goal of increasing our following on Facebook. I have always found that focusing on friends of friends is a good strategy and works by leveraging the power of association. “Jocelyn likes Ocean Vodka. I think she is cool, so I’m going to like them too; I don’t want to miss out.” It worked well and aligned with our mission to increase share of mind by not only inserting ourselves into our target audience’s daily customer journey within the feed, but also influencing friend-to-friend chatter and utilizing social communities. The social buzz took effect, and everyone was talking about it. Did you see that on Facebook? Are you on Twitter? It was a frenzy, and our customer journeys were forever changing. 

Then It All Changed…
Once again, it changed. Like all online media, the platform has changed significantly over the past few years, and with it, advertisers’ options to reach fans organically have declined dramatically. Most everything is a paid advertisement online. The way I like to explain it conceptually to clients is that you are only as good as your last post. Just like with a traditional blog or community message, each time you post content, it is added to the top of the page/board, and old content with less relevant messages is hidden further down. For example, if your dog was missing and you brought a sign into the coffee shop, chances are they would post that right in the middle of the board because it’s important and people love dogs. If you came in again with a sign for a lemonade stand, it might not make the board, be tacked to the bottom, or be covered up quickly. There isn’t enough space for all messages, and as we’ve learned, not everything is equal when it comes to content. And it makes sense. With so many users, social platforms want to make sure that content creators spend more time creating each post and stay relevant with their fan base. Creators that fail to do this are penalized with less visibility. Also, just because you liked Ocean Vodka last month doesn’t mean you still want to see posts from them on the regular. I might be into something else, like planning my home remodel or finding activities for my upcoming trip. The individual landscape changes for each user based on what they’re searching for. So how do social platforms know what to show you? They measure each post’s engagement statistics and then curate your content feed to ensure that you are seeing a healthy mix of friend and fan content during each active session. The result of this shift limits the number of organic, free posts to followers and directly impacts your personal account. Meaning, unless you like your friend/family’s content, you will stop seeing it. Every post your company makes sets a new baseline for your account in terms of relevance. If that post has no likes, comments, or shares, then it will not be shown. However, the catch 22 here is that unless the post is shown, no one can engage with it. So that then brings us to the topic of paid posts and strategy. 

Our goal was to maintain a large active audience so that when the client had a promotion or some important branding message to share, it would be guaranteed to reach the largest percentage of our base at a minimum spend. 

I tested my theory, starting with go! Airlines. I posted engagement content once a week and then branding or promotional content on the bookends, i.e., Monday: airline trivia/did you know, Wednesday: engagement, and Friday: promotion. For the engagement posts, I would feature irresistible Hawaii, such as a beautiful picture of a rainbow over a waterfall with a post saying, “Like if you Love Hawaii Rainbows,” “Share” if “Rainbows Make You Smile” or “Where was the most beautiful rainbow you have ever seen?” Content that invited the audience to engage without much effort, effectively keeping my growing organic audience size consistently active. 

At that time, best practice was to boost all posted content, which meant I paid to guarantee my post reached more people, both my friends and friends of their friends, with a budget of $1 per day and ran it for 10–30 days, sometimes longer. Depending on the overall results, I kept boosting and expanding the reach. The good news was that top content (posts with lots of likes, comments, and shares) was easier for Facebook to continue to promote at a lower price. It’s no different than any SEO rank; the content that people keep liking is more enjoyable and will make users want to keep scrolling, so let’s show it to more people. The results were incredible. At the time, across all my major accounts, the trend was consistent, and I didn’t have to spend more than $10–$15 per post on the “serious brand content” to reach 60% or more of my audience. I was spending half of my previous ad budget, less than $500 a month, and getting way more engagement. Clients were thrilled and that’s when we started to reallocate efforts and funds to other types of engagement strategies like Woobox contests and brand outreach, where the agency would become the brand (login to their account) and scroll down the feed liking and commenting on partners’ content, news articles, and other B2B-focused associated industries to build credibility and goodwill. Today, this is still one of the best ways to increase fans and influence share of mind, Just think about how much time you spend on one social media post for your brand. Doesn’t it feel sad when no one engages? Imagine if you saw a comment from one of your favorite partners telling you how much they loved it. Chances are you will follow their page back. Now that you’re top of mind, maybe they’ll think of you for an upcoming project or refer you. That’s the power of social networking.  

It wasn’t until March 2018, when the platform changed again, that we experienced diminishing results. I noticed that the estimated impressions and audience reach stopped showing. In the past, when you wanted to create an ad or boost a post, depending on the settings and budget, Facebook would estimate the number of people you could reach and provide a cost per thousand impressions. Not anymore. That means that you have no idea how many people your budget will reach or any solid metrics for success, whether in estimated conversions, clicks, etc. How can they not provide any guidance? How were we going to figure out a budget or compare results with other online tools offering CPC, CPM, and, you know, regular data points? Did they not know for real, or, the more likely reason, was that they didn’t want someone like me running a lot of data points and coming back requesting a credit when the estimates didn’t line up (i.e., you said I would reach 8,000–10,000 people but the report says 7,500, and I want a credit on my account). They wanted to guarantee to spend your full campaign budget, and the only way that was possible was to be vague. For example, let’s say our business wants to promote a seminar for exit planning in Chicago that is happening in 5 days. After we build our campaign on Facebook, we might learn that our potential reach is 10,000 people, and we decide to spend $100 per  day over the next 5 days. Had Facebook promised a specific reach per day but couldn’t deliver it, they would have to issue a credit. All to say, if those people in our desired target audience are not online, they can’t potentially serve them ads. They will do their best, but it depends on how many sessions that user has as well as what other advertisers are bidding on the same eyes. Overall, this can drastically swing your CPM or CPC results from campaign to campaign.

Anna’s Tip: Always create long-tail lifetime ads on Facebook that last 30 days and give the platform time to deliver the best results and make the match. The shorter the campaign length, the higher the cost to deliver impressions and generate clicks. 

Then it got really hard. Facebook announced that any post that asked the customer to like, comment, share, or watch was considered clickbait and would not be shown to the active audience. Wait WHAT?! That also included posts with links. Facebook didn’t want people to leave, hence why they didn’t want clicks posted off page, and they wanted to charge businesses to reach fans—no freebies. I believe that this was also the result of a cultural shift. People became more introverted, and as our friend list grew to include people that really weren’t our friends at all, the result was that overall engagement was down because it was diffused across a wider audience. Without the engagement content, how would we reach anyone? Duh, with ads. Which would be just fine, but if we have no control over audience reach or bidding strategies, how do we really know if the ads are even being delivered? When we did run ads, the results were declining in terms of trackable conversions and traffic on our sites. The only campaigns that proved to have any measurable ROI were for retailers, and that made sense as it was easier to identify behavioral trends and track results when a full credit card transaction occurred. However, even those results were declining. That’s when we pulled the cord and shifted the client’s media spend to other efforts. We continued to boost some post content and run some small campaigns, mostly for retailers, to make sure that the clients who cared about looking cool wouldn’t visit their own page and see zero likes. Overall, this shift resulted in the agency recommending that clients spend a couple hundred dollars a month (if any) rather than the thousands we had before.  

So what happened? The answer is alarming so prepare yourselves. It was April of 2021 when I first found a company called ClickCease, a Telavi-based company that protects ad campaigns from bot clicks. ClickCease offers protection on GoogleAds, Microsoft and Facebook. After setting up my free trial, I was impressed with how quickly I saw the problem. Assuming that the Facebook impressions were being delivered, ClickCease was reporting that, on average, 30–50% of the clicks on those campaigns had been blocked as bots. That’s right. These are not competitors; it’s the platform trying to make more money by clicking on their own ads. It all added up. If they spent all your budgeted money per campaign, no matter what, without any user control over cost-per-action, then the numbers were going to be all over the map. What advertiser in their right mind would agree to continue spending without any consistent or expected metrics? Cost per impression, cost per view, cost per click, cost per sale—these numbers needed to have a pattern but they didn’t. So Facebook used AI to make sure they did. Going back to our 5-day event example, if at the end of the campaign, Facebook charged us $500, they could just make up any number for impression share, fabricate views, and engagement results, but what advertisers really cared about was website traffic clicks and conversions. So they used bots for both. The result? Companies think that it’s them. Oh wow, we got all these clicks and cart adds; why didn’t anyone buy? It must be our pricing and our website design, right? Wrong. Once the ClickCease protection was in place, I quickly saw our Hilo Hattie and Diamond Bakery cost-per-sale numbers drop back into alignment with previous benchmarks, and we increased spend and results once again.  

My agency posts 2-3 times a week for clients on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and GoogleMyBusiness (which is the most underutilized platform out there, no cost with high SEO reward) as part of our regular MACs (Marketing Activity Calendars). The concept that matters is called social virality, which means your brand’s collective online influence across all social channels. The higher the score, the more our off-site rank will increase, which results in more organic visibility. Most importantly, it can directly influence your search impression share when engaging in search intent marketing. What business owners must consider before engaging in any social media strategy are your goals for each tool, and what you’re willing to invest in terms of man hours and paid spend to reach those goals. During my social media best practices presentation, I walk clients through each channel and discuss the opportunities and threats. Depending on our goals for brand awareness vs. sales, we might also extend our post strategy to include Nextdoor, TikTok, and Pinterest. That being said, we always remain on high alert, and when the numbers don’t add up, we play hardball and demand answers from our vendors. We act fast to protect our clients’ interests. Bottomline, what worked before will change, and it’s not you; it’s them. Trust in your gut and pause efforts when you feel something isn’t adding up; it’s better to regroup than to overspend.

SEO Continued – Online Article

By |2024-12-08T09:12:24+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

To this day, SEO is one of the most common things clients ask about. It was a buzzword that stung, but is it worth spending money on? This chapter is sure to upset a lot of people, but believe me when I tell you that committing to paid SEO services is one of the easiest ways to be taken advantage of as a business owner. SEO is the darkest of the dark arts, and, like all digital tools, has changed dramatically over the past few decades. So, what the heck is it anyway? 

SEO, or Search Engine Optimization, and can be broken down by the baseline metric of visibility. A search engine’s job is to deliver the best, most applicable content to the consumer. How search engines make money is by retaining high user adoption. So, the goal of Google, Yahoo, Firefox, Safari, Bing, and all the search engines is to command more searches from their distinct browsers. The more daily users they maintain, the easier it is to monetize user access and sell their influence to advertisers or political entities. For them to gain loyalty or adoption, they need to create the smoothest, most efficient browsing experience possible, and that variable experience must effectively translate across devices. That means delivering the best, most relevant content to the consumer so they can find what they’re looking for fast, very fast (ideally, at the top of the first page of results). It means providing a safe, secure place to browse and enjoy content and communities across devices seamlessly—the fewer interruptions, the better. 

So, how do the search engines know what content is most relevant to the end user? The answer is divided into two parts: On-Site SEO and Off-Site SEO. 

On-Site SEO: The most important thing for most companies is to have a well-defined content strategy on their website. Whether it’s Google, Bing, any and all engines have these tiny little robots that scan website content and evaluate content, design, and accessibility. Text, images, and videos may all be part of this data collection, but the most important thing to remember is that this process can’t read an image, so if we want that content to count, we need to provide a written description of the image so the search engine can add those keywords to our total score, or rank. We call these alt tags, and they go behind the picture in code but are shown over it to the end user when they hover over the image. 

Anna’s Tip:
There are a plethora of uses for Alt tags, especially in catering to sight-impaired users, and are critical to website accessibility. Thorough descriptions of images in this space improve the overall quality of said images and give all users the opportunity to see exactly what your business has to offer. At the same time, increase the total relevant keywords on your site to bolster your website’s rank in the search engines you advertise on.

Once the search engine has scanned your website, it creates a rank of relevance. Relevance pertains to the keywords you’re bidding for, the content of both your website and your ad, location, and more, while measuring those metrics against what the customer is searching for. For example, let’s say we are selling Tacos at our food truck in Denver. A hungry customer opens Google and searches for “Taco Trucks Denver,” and Google gets to work identifying, out of all the websites it crawled, how many references to “Taco Trucks Denver” did it find? If your website has 10 pages and 20 references to the keyword phrase and a competitor has 100 pages with 500 references, who do you think will appear higher in search? Duh, the competitor. That’s why companies have blogs; sure, people read them, but the primary goal is to continue to increase website content and keyword counts so that our site is seen as more relevant than other sites. The problem with this is the lack of resources. Will your company ever create more content than Food & Wine or a local magazine pumping out hundreds of pages of content every month? In some competitive industries like solar, you’re up against a lot of big boys — SolarReviews, Best Company, Yelp, Angi, BBB, EnergySage— the list is long. The result is that even if you add a unique article every day to your blog, which many small businesses don’t have the capacity to accomplish, you can’t guarantee that you will be on the first page of Google. It’s a revolving door, and others are also creating content worldwide. Even then, let’s say we contract an SEO company and we agree that “Solar Company Arizona” is the keyword we care most about and for people physically living in Phoenix, we want to be organically at the top of that search. The SEO company gets us there, and now we enter maintenance mode, working hard and spending thousands every month to keep our position. Worth it? Well, what if someone searches for “Arizona’s Best Solar Company” or “Solar Arizona Company”? The combination of the search results changes for each keyword phrase (it’s the sequence of the keywords). So now you need to spend more money to index for how many potential sequences of the popular searches? The math doesn’t add up. Especially when I can guarantee your top-page placement for a fraction of the cost with a Google or Microsoft Search Ad. So, why do we do SEO at all? Because, like all digital tools, they work in tandem. Unfortunately, it does matter. 

On-site SEO directly impacts your customers journey from search to visit, and for some designated as disabled, how they experience your site. It also impacts your search impression share rank, which has a meaningful correlation to your cost-per-click when advertising in search. The better your rank, the less you will have to spend to reach more people. Why? The search engines job is to match each customer with the best results so they are happy and continue to use Chrome, Firefox, Edge or said browser for all searches forever (and from all devices). Like all dating sites, if you’re super hot, then the platform wants to make sure you’re a top result and easy to find (Hinge, for example, places such commodities in the Standouts section within its interface) so people keep coming back for more. That is to say, the best results look good and are easy to find.

Once the search is initiated, organic results will appear below the paid ads and have a few important elements that you will want to be in control of to increase the likelihood of a customer clicking on your link over a competitor. The meta title is the first large headline, and the meta description is the two lines of copy beneath the result. How they generate is whether your company either sets them manually, or if you don’t, the search engine will pull the first allotted number of characters on your website page and show those. The easiest way to tell is by seeing a dot-dot-dot at the end of either the Meta Title or Meta Description. That means that the characters exceeded the maximum allowed. It also results in a strange description for the customer.

See, in this example for Denver Taco Truck, Search results showing Instagram and website links for Denver Taco Truck and Dos Gringos Food Truck in Denver, CO, featuring fusion-style tacos and Mexican-American cuisine. the IG example has “Wheels On Fire” and other strange references in the description because Google is fabricating meta descriptions using site copy off the linked page in order (every text on the page) vs. the second reference of “Dos Gringos Food Truck” has an exact description and is more relevant to me, the searcher (no dot dot dot at the end). This helps increase click-through-rates because the searcher knows what they can expect to see after they click through to the site. Not setting accurate or thoughtful meta descriptions leads to high bounce rates. A bounce happens when a customer clicks on your website and then doesn’t complete a full landing. They see the site and click right out, closing the tab, returning to the search page, or moving on to a different search/URL entirely. They may also hover over your first page or scroll down before making a full exit.

An exit occurs when the customer makes a full landing, but then you might experience a high bounce rate on the page if your site design is poor or what the customer expected to see was not what you delivered. The top reasons for bounce are that the site was too slow to load, the design was poor (not aesthetically appealing, broken links, easy-to-recognize bugs), or the result was not expected. Remember when we talked about Google Ads and not letting the algorithm show ads to people asking, “Who shows interest in our location?” Well, this is a perfect example: If I search for a food truck in Denver and a link pops up for Houston, that click will bounce because the search is irrelevant. Luckily, with organic search, you don’t have to worry about this because those clicks don’t cost anything. If your company is showing up for a keyword phrase in organic search, it means that it is relevant. Your job is to make your listing look better than other organic competitors, and then once the customer clicks, make sure they like what they see.   

  • Meta Title -> Maximum Characters: 60
  • Meta Description -> Maximum Characters: 160, but as Google can change suddenly (it used to be longer), and to be on the safe side, it’s recommended to shoot for between 120 and 158 characters so you get any unwanted dots. 

For alt tags, the more robust you can make them, the better. Unless the company was a landscape architect like J. Montgomery, our favorite Alamo client, or an artist where each case study and gallery image was critical to their product story, the agency would do the bare minimum. For most companies, robust descriptions were not going to lift rank, and we did them to make sure we didn’t get flagged. In the event a reader was used, they would know enough from our brief description. That was at least prior to the new accessibility rules rolled out in 2023. Here’s an example of what changes need to be made to make your site pass all scrutiny.   

Example of current Alt Text = “Social Awards Graphic,” would, under the aforementioned guidelines, be replaced with New Alt Text = “Logos showing [clients name] online brand reputation, including a Google 4.7 star rating logo, Yelp 5 star rated logo, Best Settings page for adding an image in a web editor, showing options for image aspect ratio, lightbox display, and alt text with a preview of social awards graphic including Google and Yelp ratings.Company top 3 ranked 2023 badge, SolarReviews 2020 Pre-Screen Solar Pro certification badge, NextDoor Neighborhood Favorite 2021 badge, and Facebook 4.7 star reviews logo displayed together in a row”. All buttons and hovers need to be defined as well: “This is a button that will take you to the free quote page,” “hover over this icon and it will show two results: home or business,” etc. These on-page updates do not apply to all companies. Those that are really at the greatest risk are those that are 25 million and above, and for the rest of us, installing an accessibility plugin on WordPress or other CRMS should be adequate. The good news is that your company has 30 days to respond to and amend any notice stating that your site is discriminating against a type of user before you might find yourself in a lawsuit or the subject of a penalty. 

You may think that sounds like a big commitment, but it doesn’t have to be. The most important thing is to make sure your website has been optimized with Meta Titles, Meta Descriptions, Meta Keywords, basic Alt Tags, a G4 Analytics code to track user traffic (bonus if you add events to track soft & hard goals), a privacy policy, and a sitemap. 

Then comes off-site SEO. Search engines assume that high-value websites, or more trusted sites with better content for the consumer, will have more references or links found on other reputable sites online. Just like when we buy media through the exchange, search engines believe that any website that has more than 10,000 daily unique visitors is considered more valuable; otherwise, they wouldn’t have this type of daily traffic. It means that whatever content they are providing, people like it and come back for more. If one of those high-value sites has a hyperlink and a reference to your site, that means that we trust you more by association. Thus, the goal of off-site SEO is to link-build, or create backlinks, and to have as many references to your site on other valuable sites as possible. This can be a lot of work, and for years my agency provided these services to clients because it was easier to achieve results and stay at the top of organic search. What changed? There were fewer companies online and more tips and tricks like keyword stuffing or ways to ping the Google Search Console to crawl our sites faster. Those techniques labeled “black hat” no longer work and will have the opposite result of dropping your rank. All that said, when I first started playing the game in 2011, the results were undeniable. 

I learned SEO from a local dude named Nate Burgoyne. He was highly recommended to me by a friend who said, “Nate is by far the best SEO guy I have ever worked with,” and he gave me his number. When I called Nate, he gave me his rate and said that for most people, an hour or two-lessons was enough to get me started. At the time, I was helping my ex-husband with his private chef company, Covert Affairs, and was all-in. He was cooking for Kanye West, Seal, and Mariah Carrey. Big names, and I knew that with a better online presence, his business would grow. Nate came to our rental in St. Louis Heights and told me what I needed to do. “Ok, so just like our strategy is to increase organic search on Google, there are other companies out there whose goal is to generate more traffic to their URLs so they can sell advertising. How they do that is they need a lot of content, but they don’t have enough writers to stay competitive, so what they do is use syndicated content,” he paused and opened a site called EZArticles.com, an article publishing system. I needed to open an account and become an expert author in our category, posting 3-5 articles every month. The trick was that the article could not include anything about your company; it had to be generic. Nate proceeded, “Then, when the article is approved on the bottom, they will include a short paragraph and link back to your site in the about the author section,” which is the backlink that you need to increase your total rank. It seemed easy enough, right? Wrong. It was pretty hard to get the articles approved at first. The rules on length, formatting, and style were limiting. They had guidelines or tips on what types of articles were recommended, for example, 5 tips to make your polenta perfect, tasty local Hawaii recipes to try, four popular ways to cut a pineapple, do’s and don’ts to fry the perfect malasada, etc. Once they did get approved, the publishers would pick up your article and repost it on hundreds of other sites, lifting your off-site rank. To really maximize your results, you would take the same article and rewrite it, but this time include references to your brand, layer as many keywords as you could, and post it to your blog. Now you had off-site and on-site growing together and working in tandem. The last step is: “Now you want to write a social media post with a link to your blog on Facebook, so you have another direct reference to your content.” It seemed to make sense. I wrote three on-site articles a week, one new recipe, a wine review, and a restaurant review, plus 3 off-site articles a month about finding the best private chef or other related topics to increase the number of “Private Chef Hawaii” references as much as possible. The results, CovertAffairs.com was at the top of search for years, even long after I stopped creating new content. 

However, suddenly, sites that were once successful at lifting keyword rank month-over-month started to go backward, not forward. Overall, there was just too much competition to keep up with, and it wasn’t worth the time and investment for either party—the agency or the client. That’s when we switched our strategy, and today, we use EINnewsire.com distribution to achieve productive rank growth for clients. It’s slow and steady.

By pushing funds toward Search Marketing, we can guarantee that your ad will reach the top of the page, and at a lower cost, because unlike paying for organic placement, impressions are free in paid search. So, let’s let Google or Microsoft run our ads based on exactly what crazy search term the customer enters (as long as it’s on our exact match list), building impression share, and brand share of mind (brand power). Now, instead of paying hundreds a month for the chance to be seen, we pay for actual human website traffic while protecting against customer thresholding (this means that we tell ClickCease how frequently to show the same person who already clicked on our ad another ad, which protects against abuse by not allowing the same person or a competitor to click on your ad multiple times and exhaust your budget). Then our goal as marketers is to increase results through deeper optimization on both ends. The better our offsite rank and onsite performance, the more our ads will show at a lower cost per click. That’s all there is to it. It’s not complicated, but like everything we have been learning, it can change, so we need the flexibility to pivot. For example, several years ago, the go-to press release distribution partner was PR Newswire but then we made the switch to EIN for two reasons. The price was much lower, but more importantly, we noticed that old releases had been taken down from third-party websites on PR Newswire. That’s right, we clicked on the provided report hyperlinks, and after 3 months, the content was no longer available, resulting in no backlink increase, aka, a waste of money. 

Online platform changes may be scary, but it’s all about perspective. I always tell my team, “Hey, let’s keep looking at the data and understand that we will figure it out first,” and we tend to. Change is the opportunity to get ahead of competitors who put trust in the wrong partners, aren’t asking the right questions, or have set and forgotten their digital strategies. It worked before and will keep working, right? Wrong. 

When I first noticed how valuable EINnewswire.com was to moving the needle, it was during a routine visit to one of my favorite sites, spyfu.com. They provide both a premium paid version and a free tool that allows you to spy on a competitor’s traffic — how many keywords did they gain or lose, are they advertising online and what are they spending, how does your website compare and does Google even consider you a paid or organic competitor of that domain, etc. I use it frequently, and no, it’s not perfect. For instance, I can tell you that the estimated AdWords budgets are not correct. Whatever you see in Spyfu multiplies it by 4-5x and that’s closer to what true spend is, but regardless, it’s a helpful resource. During this visit, I noticed that all our press releases were listed with exceptional backlink value. Here’s an example of a recent one we published for Pacific Air Cargo. The result is a double win and a way to combine Public Relations services with Off-Site SEO for the agency. The cost? Just $99 per release or cheaper with a package (recommended to go Pro for the best value; more links!) That’s math everyone can subscribe to. 

Screenshot of inbound links (backlinks) showing domain and page monthly organic clicks, domain strength, and ranked keywords for three URLs.

And now that we know how it all works, here’s how you spot a fraud. I will say, however, that just because your SEO company hasn’t lifted your rank doesn’t mean that they are frauds; they might be trying hard and doing the promised work. The agency had a partner in India who worked his butt off, but the rank kept slipping. How I knew he wasn’t a fraud was that he provided supporting, detailed reports to the agency, and even when the rank slipped, he was honest and still showed the unfavorable results, including a plan or recommendation on how to achieve the desired rank once again. 

So, for all of you companies being sold “SEO services” from the USA or abroad, the same rules apply. Every month, you should be presented with a current report of your site’s rank based on a list of keyword phrases. You should have two reports, one for the full universe of Google and one that is localized; for example, what would someone searching in Seattle see? Your SEO partner should also be telling you when they expect to lift your rank from whatever current position to a future desired position of 1–5, or page 1 of the results. You should also have a list of keywords that you are watching and working on moving up into basic indexing so that you can establish a first rank. That’s the first step in moving up; you need a current rank number, 260 or whatever it is, and a plan in place for how many months and articles it will take to get you to position 100, then to 50, and then to 20, and then to 5, and then if you slip to 7, why and how long to get back to 5, you get the idea. A lot of this work demands the ability to evaluate data to project future trends and potential outcomes for your rank. If they are not providing you with those two things, then it’s time to press pause. That’s the bare minimum. You should also be receiving proof (links) to the published articles on whatever network they are using, as well as reports on how many references to your offsite content have been published. For companies that are just getting started, don’t even start unless you are willing to commit for 2-3 years and are happy not to receive any trackable or direct ROI. 

I’m not saying SEO strategies don’t or won’t work. All that I’m saying is to set your expectations, trust your instincts, and, as with most things, if you’re in it for the long haul, be patient.

Brand Reputation Management

By |2024-12-08T09:18:13+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

Throughout our technology transformation, one of the most impactful tools we utilize is brand reputation management. In the past, communication was primarily in one direction; the media or company spoke to the customer through traditional controlled media, i.e., TV, radio, print ads, editorials, spotlights, and the like. The consumer read, listened, and watched, but didn’t have a way to verify the information they had learned or a direct channel back to the source. Sure, you could write a letter to the company’s customer service department or a letter to the editor, explaining your negative experience, but beyond using a stamp or walking into the corporate office to voice your concerns, options were limited. This allowed the media and brands to control the dialogue and left consumers in the dark and isolated. With the birth of the internet, and specifically Web 2.0, this interaction changed.

Finally, the individual had a voice and a public forum to share their opinions. Companies like Yelp, Amazon, eBay, and Trip Advisor became trusted sources that offered customers a voice and platform to share feedback, be heard, and protect themselves from picking the wrong provider. Corporations had no choice but to join these new virtual communities and take ownership of their customers’ experiences. To become a trusted company, the consumer expected to see 4-5 star ratings while conducting their intent research online. Reviews quickly became a key decision factor when picking one company over another. Today, that list of trusted sites has grown, including Google Business Profile (formerly Google My Business), Better Business Bureau, Angi, Nextdoor, and niche review sites like Houzz, SolarReviews, BestCompany, WebMD, etc., which were established to provide customers with safer solutions based on industry or interest. As a result, service providers popped up to help companies ask for reviews, respond, and report from a single source, such as Birdeye, Hatch, and Podium, among others. Reviews became important, if not crucial, and just a one-star review could send clients into full crisis mode. What started out with the best of intentions gradually declined and became a victim of fraud, just like other digital platforms. The problem today is that, with so many different sources and unverified reviews, how did we really know if they were legitimate? From old employees to competitors, bots to paid services, the industry dirtied the concept, creating a void of distrust on both sides. What do I mean? Let’s break it down.

Yelp

This sorry excuse for a company should not only make them ashamed of themselves but also put them on trial for unethical business practices. What started out as the number one most trusted free review platform has become the plague of the industry. Somewhere along the way, they forgot that their core value was to help share the truth and protect consumers. What if I told you that there is zero oversight or validation on Yelp? Anyone can create an account and start making reviews. Not only that, but anyone can create an unverified business page and do so when one isn’t found that they want to post a review for. Then business owners are expected to claim that page to be able to reply or update business information, but how can we trust that the person who claimed the page is in fact the business owner? Anyone can create a Gmail or fake website that looks like a reputable company and essentially steal leads or misinform the public. There is no EIN or formal paperwork required; you just need an email address, phone number, and URL, and then you’re in. Think about how many scam emails you receive in a week from companies pretending to be PayPal, USPS, or your bank, with email templates that look shockingly real in design and all the way through to click/login. The only way to tell that these emails are NOT from the real entity is by looking at the email address they were sent from. If it is not the official domain, then it’s bogus. Over the past decade, we have had multiple clients with official business pages share other customer-created pages with slight variations that cause customer confusion and brand heartache, i.e., maybe the address they enter is wrong, so Yelp creates a new listing using that Yelper’s data when in fact the real business already has a profile. That being said, it wasn’t hard for a customer to tell while searching which profile was the official brand because those profiles had a company logo. Pro-advertising options were available to boost your company in search results by location, competitive keywords, and overall impression share. And truth be told, I had some success with Yelp advertising for a period of time (2015–2019), seeing positive results for restaurants and solar companies. My only complaint was that the cost per click was outrageous and far higher than other paid sources like Google, resulting in an unfavorable cost per conversion. When I first broached the topic with one of the reps, they shared that I could change my strategy to focus not on website visits but instead on free quote requests inside of the platform. And it worked. My solar cost per solar lead decreased. We started to share results with other clients and increased efforts to drive positive reviews to this source over others.

Once we had a few clients advertising, I noticed a trend. Unless clients replied within 1 hour of the initial inquiry, the chances of reaching them declined dramatically. Also, the biggest problem was that although the customer filled out a free quote request, we (the client) didn’t have any personal contact information, i.e., a phone number or email address. The only way to communicate with that lead was through the Yelp platform, making it impossible to nurture leads (email or text automations) or truly understand the conversion rates without manual reporting (and even then, that wasn’t the big picture because too many factors contributed with regard to lead-to-speed, and unless we can get that person into the CRM, understanding the true value is just not possible). That, coupled with Yelp starting to upsell other paid advertisers on the quote form, made it shady. For example, a customer could request a quote from my solar company, and then at the end they would see other competitors and be asked if they wanted more quotes from them. It was great for Yelp, essentially allowing them to sell more leads to the same consumer, but not good for the company that the customer had initially been interested in. Other solar companies will now swarm them, making it less likely that I will be able to contact them.

Example:

Before long, Yelp was selling every type of feature: now companies had to pay to block other advertisers from appearing on their companies’ page; they had to pay for a call-to-action button (CALL US); they had to pay Yelp for Business page showing how uploading a logo can make your business profile look more professional, featuring Better Solar Solution's listing and a sample business profile.for image carousels to control what customers saw, i.e., company-approved pictures vs. posted pictures from Yelpers. Even then, it wasn’t egregious. Sure, they needed to monetize the platform, and these were ways to do that. The single biggest problem was that Yelp does not verify that reviewers were real people physically located in the area of whatever companies they chose to review. Yelp has refused to remove numerous instances of fake reviews on client accounts despite the agency’s ability to provide solid evidence that the reviewer was not a real customer. In fact, they often will not show real reviews from customers that have less than three total Yelp reviews. Ok, so let me just make sure I understand. You (YELP) will charge my client for every click and believe yourself to be the trusted source of truth, but then when we come to you and can prove beyond reasonable doubt that these 1-3 star reviews are fake, crickets? In my mind, it’s senseless to prioritize the person who isn’t paying for your platform. Because they don’t verify whether a customer is real, leaving a real review based on real experience, they also can’t verify those discrepancies aren’t real. And then when we can prove that a positive 4-5 star review was from a real customer (contract signed), it gets hidden because they are not commonly engaging on your platform? Not ok. That just boils down to a corrupted and broken one-sided pay-to-play model. The icing on the cake? In 2020, they started to charge companies $1 per day to showcase their company logo on their business listings. So now a small mom & pop must spend $30 a month just to show a logo so that customers can trust that they are, in fact, on the official profile page?

So let me get this straight: just to have a logo, block competitors, and add details about your brand, before you even start paid search, your cost as a business owner is $6 per day or $2,190 per year? That’s excessive; wouldn’t you agree? Just for the privilege, rather than the opportunity, to present your brand to eager Yelpers seeking trusted solutions? As well, Yelp no longer allows advertisers to pick the type of ad they want to run. So instead of driving free quote requests inside the platform, it’s blended together with website clicks, call clicks, and free quote requests. So much for spending your money how you want to.

Screenshot of Yelp ad campaign setup options, showing goals such as letting Yelp optimize, getting more phone calls, and getting more website clicks.
Screenshot of Outerland Design's Yelp business page, highlighting blocked competitor ads and business highlights such as 20 years in business, availability by appointment, and family ownership.
Screenshot of Yelp search results showing Outerland Design listed with 20 years in business and availability by appointment, along with competitor businesses.

Now that I’m on my soapbox, let’s dive deeper into a current solar client’s self-managed campaign from July/August 2023. Now, the first thing to always be on the lookout for is when companies blend date ranges to make their data look better. See below the total Ad Contribution: We had 217 ads over the last 12 months (spending $44,358 at a cost per click of $30 and a CPM of $208.39!). On the same page, Yelp is also reporting Last 30 Days results of 23 leads from paid ads. Leads include CTA clicks, messages, website visits, and calls, but again, verification comes into play here: who is vetting whether or not those metrics actually converted into leads? Readers, from what we learned thus far in The Covert Code, you should be asking yourself, 1) How do we know if the clicks or calls were real people rather than bots, or worse, solicitors? 2) Did these calls happen, and were they truly qualified? 3) What is the average cost per lead, or cost per sale, from this paid source? In the following example, we will use Google Analytics to validate clicks for CallRail phones and a manual count of Yelp inbox messages. Let’s get started:

In this example, the client hasn’t been with the agency for a full year. Let’s look at that sample size over the last 30 days to assess the true value of the campaign. Note: Of all times to pull an audit, and to be fair to our vendor, we are choosing a time period smack dab in the middle of the solar season and amidst one of the hottest heat waves ever reported in Arizona. Our expectations are that the data should be better than ever, right? Wrong.

Of the 29 total leads reported — 5 calls, 13 website visits, 11 messages, and 0 CTA clicks—for a total of 29 leads — 23 from paid ads and 6 organic ads Yelp search results for solar installation companies in Peoria, AZ, featuring Sunsolar Solutions, Aneva Solar, and Green Muscle Solar with ratings, reviews, and options to request quotes. (but no, they don’t break down whether those are clicks, calls or messages.) First, I went to CallRail and was only able to attribute Yelp as the source for 1 call over that period of time, not 5. Similarly, GoogleAnalytics G4 only shows 7 users and 8 sessions, not 13. Finally,  when reviewing each message manually inside of the Yelp system itself, we only count 10 and not 11. Wait, WHAT? Even inside Yelp, the numbers don’t match. More questions than answers emerged; the numbers were just not adding up, so I wrote to my rep to find out.

To add more fuel to my firYelp search results for solar installation companies in Peoria, AZ, featuring Sunsolar Solutions, Aneva Solar, and Green Muscle Solar with ratings, reviews, and options to request quotes.e, while searching for my client on Yelp (physically located in Oahu, Hawaii), I was served sponsored ad results for solar companies in Peoria, Arizona. Isn’t that just asking for poor results by allowing third-party entities to review using bots, control the dialogue, click on ads, and inflate Yelps numbers? What you would expect is that, as you are physically targeting people living in Peoria, someone outside of that geo-region would see organic search rather than paid search because, in all of your good sense, would you pay for someone outside of your targeted locations to click on your ad? Remind you of someone? (Hint: It should remind you of our friends, Google and Microsoft). But this is way worse because not only can we not control the settings (option to change from default to presently located), we can’t even control the ads we run (calls vs. clicks vs. free quotes). 

So now, having measured resultsYelp ad performance overview from July 13, 2023, to August 11, 2023, displaying a graph of ad clicks and impressions. Includes data on ad impressions, ad clicks, average cost-per-click, and ad spend for two periods. against each of my tracking platforms and evaluated their quality, I’m left with 1 unqualified call, 0 website conversions, and a handful of message replies that confirmed no sales from the client. I went to the overview of ad performance to see the total cost. The client spent $3,614.37 in total, and the reported clicks of 148 are just to the profile page from inside the platform. That’s why it shows 153 page visits on the total page; those other 5 clicks came from direct sources and were not tracked as ad clicks. The result was a $248 cost per thousand impressions and a meager 1% click-through rate (remember, best practice with CTR is that if it’s below 2%, the ad needs to change). HARD PASS. This is straight-up fraud. So what do we do about it? Let’s make them open their books and refund all the business owners they have lied to, and, unless they agree to ethical business practices, let’s burn it to the ground.

Yelp ad performance for the last 30 days showing 14.6k impressions (86% of total), 153 page visits (39% of total), and 23 leads (79% of total).

Period Ad impress clicks cost-per-click Ad spend CMP CTR
Aug 1 – Aug 11  5,612 64 $24.37 $1,559.90 $277.96 1.14%
Jul 13 – Jul 31 8,940 84 $24.46 $2,054.47 $229.81 0.94%
Total 14,552 148 $24.42 $3,614.37 $248.38 1.02%

NextDoor

On the other side of the coin, we have Nextdoor. They’re everything that Yelp isn’t. Not only do they verify that every business is in fact the owner by asking for an EIN and additional information, but they also offer the same level of protection to each homeowner by ensuring that those with access to their community are physically located in that neighborhood. And no, a Nextdoor user cannot see the community posts from anyone outside of their approved location. Nextdoor also does not charge businesses to be listed and offers ways to control ad location, reach, and more. That being said, the agency still has experienced inflated click numbers inside the platform, i.e., we haven’t been able to match up with great accuracy the reported total clicks and traffic from the platform in G4 (even with a UTM). Overall, it’s better than it was before, and depending on your company’s industry, goals, and budget, a paid campaign could be effective even when accounting for the inflated reported traffic.

Google Business Profile (formerly Google My Business, GMB) 

GMB is one of the most underutilized brand management platforms around. That might be in partGoogle reviews for Sunergy Systems, highlighting positive customer feedback and the company's expertise in solar energy and battery storage systems. Includes company details and recent updates. due to how complicated it can be to pass verification for your business’s location and ownership. In some instances, companies are required to upload a picture from the location (yes, Google can use technology to identify that the picture was taken at the latitude and longitude of the location you are trying to verify). Other ways to verify in the past included a postcard being mailed to the physical location (we miss those days). One of the limitations of the platform is changing your business’s location, as the only option is to close the current listing, which can negatively impact a company’s search as customers seeking the business might see that profile only appear over the new one (this is getting better but can happen so be on the lookout!) In addition, GMB doesn’t have a clean way for a business owner to claim multiple businesses from the same address. For example, if you have a few brand names all with the same office (all you entrepreneurs are nodding, yes?), you’re out of luck unless you have a unique suite number for each; you can’t register them. 

One of my favorite tools in GMB is the posts section. This allows businesses to share updates or content that is seen on the business profile similarly to how a traditional feed is set up for other social media outlets. It is a solid one-stop-shop for site reviews, business information, and updates. Each post appears below the Reviews and has incredible off-site SEO value. Don’t miss out on free reach!

CallTracking

By |2024-12-08T09:21:30+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

One of the most valuable tools any business can utilize is CallTracking. My preferred vendor is CallRail because of their fair pricing, clean UI, and robust integrations with an easy one-click install. Why is it so important? Going back to Attribution, many media companies will take credit for a phone call based on the length. Google Ads, for instance, will assign a conversion credit for any call that lasts over 60 seconds and is initiated from a search ad. The problem is that there’s not enough evidence to prove the value of the campaign or caller without listening to a recording of the call. Did they buy something? Were they already an existing client? Were they solicitors? Or was it a machine calling to notify you that your Google My Business profiles were not showing properly? And furthermore, is Google counting that last call as a conversion? The list of possible reasons for the call is vast. As advertisers, we care about all calls that come from ads, but it’s important that we only calculate those true “new customers” into our total cost-per-lead, cost-per-sit/cart add, and cost-per-sale. In addition to attribution, it is shocking how many phone system errors occur during transfers, leaving the customer in a black hole of endless rings and voicemail opportunities lost due to filled mailboxes or other settings that just happen. Call listening gives us the ability to address those issues as well as ensure our clients have the ability to retain customers, rather than pushing them off to another competitor.

It was a sunny day in 2017 when a client called, “The marketing isn’t working.” I pulled up his last monthly report and replied, “Well, that’s strange; I’m looking at an overall growth in forms submitted and calls over the previous month.” We went back and forth for a while, and the bottom line was that the leads were not turning into sales. In our line of work, it’s easy to blur the lines between sales and marketing. The job of the marketing department is to generate quality leads, and then it’s the sales team that is responsible for closing the loop. The problem was that neither the agency nor the client had a full picture because once the lead was generated, we didn’t know why it didn’t convert. Was it a bad sales experience? Was the lead of poor quality? And in the case of a phone call lead, there were simply too many unknowns to, without a reasonable doubt, take credit for a call that lasted over 30 or 60 seconds from a tracking number.

After some fretting, I called the client with a solution, “How would you feel if the agency listened to your inbound calls so we could get the full picture on the lead quality?” He happily agreed. At the time, we were using Twilio for call tracking, but it didn’t provide an easy way to qualify calls, leave notes on customer service interactions, or tag recordings with relevant services our clients provide. All in all, the reporting left a lot to be desired. I started researching alternatives and stumbled upon CallRail. The client agreed and we opened an account, ported all the existing tracking numbers over, linked all the third-party integrations, and added a dynamic number to the website.

A dynamic number is a pool of numbers that are swapped for visitors. It helps determine what path a customer took to make the call, whether from an ad on Google, Facebook, or Microsoft, among others. The reason for this is that by showing a unique number to each visitor, we can collect all kinds of valuable information. Who clicks when, from where, and what they’re looking for are all valuable points that can help drive future decisions. Beyond the basics: callers’ number, name, location, device used, length of call, and if it was missed or abandoned (under 15 seconds), we can collect detailed information about the customer’s journey, including the URL of the page the customer called from, any keywords they searched for in Google, the name of the paid campaign (and ad group) the customer called from, and most importantly, the source of the traffic. This is critical because, although you may have a tracking number on a campaign, that does not mean the customer called that number. Here is a common example. Let’s say we’re advertising for a car dealership online. In Google Ads, we have a tracking number for Oahu, one for Maui, and one for Kauai, and each is linked to the location-specific campaigns as call extensions. Although we didn’t dive into site extensions in our search chapter, both Google and Microsoft paid campaigns contain several assets, or potential extensions, to increase your results, including sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, location extensions, image extensions, pricing, reviews, as well as the popular call extension, which we’re talking about now. It is recommended that advertisers use as many as possible to increase Search Impression Share (and Click-Through Rates), but it is up to the search engine to pick which, if any, they show with your ad and will run what they believe, based on the customers’ browsing behavior, has the highest likelihood to generate a click. It makes sense, right? That’s how they get paid! This means that sometimes your call extension will show, but it’s not guaranteed. For those ads that do run with a call extension, the customer may pick up the phone without clicking on the ad first and call the company (and we love when this happens because then the advertiser doesn’t have to pay for a click!). In this example, our tracking report would show that the customer called the tracking number “Oahu Ad Extension” with the source of Google Ads. But what if they didn’t call the number from the ad but rather first clicked through to your website? Wouldn’t you agree that the credit should be attributed to your Google Ads, even if they called a dynamic number on your website? I would. In CallRail, they make this path easy to identify by showing the source of the call as Google Ads and the number they called as one from the dynamic pool. The same is true with other types of online media, such as Facebook, Google My Business, etc., and this information helps marketers understand the customer’s online journey and assign credit to the appropriate source.

Sadly, this does not work for traditional media. For example, let’s say we were running a TV commercial and created a tracking number called “TV spot”. Well, it’s common that a customer won’t take the time to write down the number and instead, after seeing the spot enough times, will go to a browser and search for the company by name before clicking through to their website organically (hopefully you are not advertising on your name in a Google/Microsoft intent search campaign). Now the only way to assign your TV commercial credit would be by listening to the phone call and adding a tag for “TV,” “Radio,” etc. if the customer mentioned the spot or promotional message. Tags can and should be used so that business owners can quickly assess any bottlenecks that are preventing them from converting more calls into customers. Tags will vary depending on the industry, but customer service, technical phone issues, solicitors, internal job inquiries, partnerships, and service not offered should apply to any business. One of the limitations with CallRail is requalifying a customer. The software allows for a thumbs up or thumbs down to “qualify” the caller a single time (a thumbs up turns that call a dark green color to indicate first-time conversion). Then every time the customer calls back (forever), that green thumb will shift over to the customer’s name, and instead of showing up as a Qualified Lead in the reports section of CallRail, they’ll be identified as a Qualified Call, regardless of whether or not they are calling for an additional or new service from the company The problem with this is, let’s say I’m a retailer and I sold a customer an Aloha shirt once. Now that same customer calls back to make another order. Well, I want to take credit again for that specific transaction over that period of time because, as a marketer, that shows I’m doing my job and that I am a valuable asset to the company I am generating leads for. It’s irrelevant to me that they bought something in the past. Our goal is to measure clients’ current marketing spend and sales from that promotional effort. To overcome this, the agency adds a tag for ‘repeat customer’ as well as other details on the purpose of the call and reports back to the clients weekly during our status meetings. And boy, have we heard it all!

After we started our first listening campaign, it didn’t take long to figure out the reporting issue: the client’s phone system was failing in more ways than one. We identified two problems. The first was that if the receptionist was on a call already, the phone would ring and she could answer by placing the customer on hold, but then after a period of time, it would drop the call. The second issue was that during transfers from reception to sales, they simply didn’t connect all the time. We determined that if the person was on the phone already when the transfer came through, it wasn’t going to voicemail and just kept ringing and ringing, resulting in a lot of dropped calls and unhappy customers. I was floored. No wonder the numbers weren’t adding up, and how long had this been happening?! If we hadn’t been listening, how long would it have taken to figure it out, if ever?! That’s when we rolled out CallTracking to all our clients.

And we really have heard it all. Another of my most vivid memories was from Hilo Hattie. It was over the holidays when we started to hear a strange message for callers trying to leave a voicemail. There was no welcome message saying it was Hilo Hattie, but rather just a phone system default “Leave a message beep,” leaving customers really confused. At first, it was hard to determine the issue because not all the callers encountered that strange voicemail. After some data digging, I determined it was based on the time of day. Something had changed in the VPN (virtual private network) software based on the client’s office hours, resulting in anyone calling before 8am HST not making it into the call flow logic; they were, essentially, rejected. The problem was that we were sending MailChimp Time Warp promotional emails with the goal of hitting customers’ inboxes at 6am, meaning that shoppers in the East Coast were calling us at 12am and Pacific at 3am, you get the idea. The amount of phone system issues we frequently encounter, coupled with bad customer service experiences, make the agency’s CallListening service one that we started to mandate for our full-retainer clients. Just too many things can and do go wrong, so the question is, why risk it?

That then brings us to the topic of A.I. and the ability to use scripts and tags to indicate the caller’s reason. It is still essential that a person monitor the calls that CallRail’s automations, also known as keyword spotting, mark because robots can’t read tone (at least not yet in mass applications). I could say the same word, and how I say it can drastically change my intention. To reduce the amount of labor necessary, this can be a useful tool for businesses that receive hundreds of calls per day to identify calls that require human review.

Another important topic with regard to call tracking is privacy. Many states mandate that the customer be informed that the call is being recorded, and some states, like California, require that both parties understand this customer service and the customer themselves. Call monitoring is a tool that can and should be used to assess a customer service agent’s ability to communicate with customers with great efficiency, demonstrated knowledge, and care. Those are the three factors that will determine whether or not a company secures a lead or makes a sale.

Microsoft

By |2024-12-08T09:34:02+00:00June 17th, 2024|Extended Content|

While we’re on the topic of Search Marketing, let’s talk about Microsoft Exchange, which accounts for 20% of all searches—Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, and (insert). Similar to Google, all the same rules are true in terms of bidding, targeting, and keywords. The noticeable things to be on the lookout for when increasing your search potential include campaign tracking, measuring, and optimizing. If you remember nothing else, remember to never sync Microsoft with AdWords (only on the very first import). They are not created equal, and with only 20% of the search share, your budget spend should be 1/3 of what it is on Google. ONLY if you have maxed out your Google potential will you even consider starting a Microsoft campaign. So go into your settings right now and turn off auto-import. As well, make sure you are not allowing for automatic changes to be created from the platform from the Recommendations page.

Microsoft Advertising dashboard showcasing auto-apply recommendation settings, demonstrating efficient marketing tools and strategies featured in The Covert Code.

Next, go into each campaign and set your max CPC at $2, no matter what it is in Google, to set a new baseline. Our launch budget for a new Bing account usually sits at $500. That gives enough time and data to establish how much you can and should spend on that account every month. Then only if your conversion results are favorable will you increase, and, unlike Google, things don’t change very frequently—neither should your settings. Think of Microsoft as the gravy to your paid search intent, or if you’re a big brand, an additional place to get impressions to build share-of-mind. No clicks are required; you just want to be seen and have a place at the table.

Love-Hate Relationship
The truth is that, for years, I chose not to run ads on Microsoft Exchange, and not until 2019 when I reintroduced the network back into my media mix. The reason being that we were tapped out of Google opportunities and clients needed more reach. Things were going great; clients were driving meaningful traffic at a low CPC, and it was steady. Then suddenly something horrible happened: One of my oldest and favorite solar companies, SunPower by Precis, had been spending $750 per month consistently for 8 months when suddenly the bill jumped up to $13,800. The charges were on my company Amex card, and when I logged in to check on my baby and saw the spend, I nearly threw up. What happened? To make a long story short, the system had reconnected itself with Google (auto-import), which had sizable bids at $5-$10 per click, and in a few short days, MicrosoftAds had been able to spend $2,500 per day, 5 days in a row. I tried to call Microsoft (they don’t have reps), and after hours of chatting, I finally got to a human. They told me that I had changed some settings, but I hadn’t, and surely they could see that this was not intentional and that this was out of the ordinary pattern. They said they would investigate. A couple days passed before I finally got a reply from support; they were willing to give me a one-time credit of $3,500 and a class on how Microsoft worked. I went absolutely Livid. As a result, I pulled all 10 of my client accounts and then spent 8 hours reviewing every line of historical campaign changes (Change History is a valuable tool in both Google and Microsoft). And yes, I found the line when the platform connected AdWords sync on its own 5-days before tragedy struck. I went back to them with hard proof, showing them that my user account did not make the changes, the system did, and they stood firm. So, I went to Amex with all my evidence, and they refunded me in full, no questions asked. At least somebody knows fraud when they see it!

That negative experience was enough for me to not advertise with them for 3 years, and it wasn’t until the end of 2021, when they announced a new partnership with LinkedIn and Facebook, that I decided to take another look. Today, we still expand reach via Microsoft for clients, but they’re the first on the chopping block when we need to prioritize the remainder of a monthly budget elsewhere on other ad exchange partners. Unlike Google, they don’t have a real-time partnership with ClickCease, and as a result, we have to manually block IP addresses as they are reported into each campaign. The problem with that was that each campaign’s negative IP settings only allowed for a maximum of 100 IPs to be blocked. The issue is that there are far more fake clicks or IP’s than 100 (you will notice in GoogleAds hundreds or thousands can be blocked per day!) resulting in massive overspending without solid conversion rates. So we once again started to pause or pull back budgets in Microsoft until the summer of 2023, when ClickCease added a new domain protection setting that allows us to do two things:. cross blocks negative IPs across all domains on the account. This means that if we see a bad bot click on Sea Bright Solar, we can block it on Mirasol Solar and any account under our protection from that same bad IP (or IP range) before having the chance to click on our ad in the first place, increasing results dramatically. The second feature was that we could manually add 500 negative IPs to the backend of the system, as well as IP range exclusions. The results were immediate, and overnight, our Microsoft campaigns started to return to historical performance. Low CPC, steady conversions.

One of the biggest problems with Microsoft is that they’re sneaky. Every setting (recommendation) is meant to make you think that you need to link with GoogleAds auto-sync, i.e., Resume import schedule. Why do they need them to be in sync, you must ask yourself? Do they share the same metrics for tracking or optimizing campaigns? The answer is no. Microsoft and Google are different platforms, and there is sadly no way to one-click and “import G4 goals” into Microsoft. However, you can see the Bing CPC report as a paid traffic source in Google Analytics, which can be helpful to troubleshoot issues with tracking or understand your customers paths to conversion. But the question is, if both networks have different data Microsoft Advertising interface showcasing integration tips, aligning with insights from The Covert Code book on mastering digital marketing strategies.partnerships, users, and an overall vision, why would your Microsoft campaign benefit from linking with Google at all? Shouldn’t they be looking at their own optimization score and campaign performance from their sites and real user behavior? What does your Google Ads campaign have to do with anything, and why is it such an important part of your Microsoft success?! Lastly, if they’re competitors, why does the Microsoft platform rely so heavily on the framework of Google? So readers, whenever you see the promotional offer flash in the top right corner, you click reject. You don’t want any credits to connect an automatic sync, and this connection has no impact on your ad performance, regardless of what they say about it increasing your optimization score.

Their only motivation is to take more of your hard-earned money, and they know that people spend more on Google because they command the lion share of active searches. Also, unlike GoogleAds, MicrosoftAds doesn’t have “redundant keywords,” and when you go to recommendations and add hundreds and hundreds of variations, including misspelled words, the result is that you always have more keywords on this platform. So, how could we be missing out on 747 more clicks by not auto-importing? It’s based on the bids, but ask yourself: How does the platform know this information if the advertiser imported settings from Google with a one-time sync and never again? Are these two giants sharing information without our consent? Would there even be a Microsoft Search without Google Search? Well, they certainly make it feel that way. It’s not a great differentiation or marketing tactic, that’s for sure.

The next red flag is that the numbers don’t match inside the platform. In Google, we use Search Impression Share, but in Microsoft, they go between Top Impression Rate and Absolution Top Rate. So, when I look for an example in my campaign overview (that should include all my Ad Groups inside of that campaign), I see a top impression Rate of 2.78%, which seems horrible. When I change it to Abs, the number drops to 0.64%; still not looking good.

Before you panic, on the same campaign overview sheet, scroll down, and assuming you have been running your campaigns for over 30 days, you will see a competition graph. The default setting is “impression share,” and that’s essentially the same thing as “search impression share” in Google. It means: What percentage of the time is your ad showing to people who search for an exact match keyword phrase and are physically located in the area you wish to target? Then, if we dive deeper into the Top of Page Rate or Abs. Top of Page Rate, we see that of the total impression share of 83%, of which 72% were top of page, and of those, the Abs. was around 30%. So when looking at this example below, my campaigns are looking excellent, I’d say, especially at a low cost per click of $1.18.

Graph showing competition metrics, including impression share, overlap rate, position above rate, top of page rate, abs. top of page rate, and outranking share for various advertisers such as solar-estimate.org, ecowatch.com, consumeraffairs.com, and understandsloar.org.
Graph displaying competition metrics for impression share over time. It shows data for advertisers including solar-estimate.org, ecowatch.com, consumeraffairs.com, and understandsloar.org, with the user's performance highlighted.
Graph displaying competition metrics for absolute top of page rate over time. It shows data for advertisers including solar-estimate.org, ecowatch.com, consumeraffairs.com, and understandsloar.org, with the user's performance highlighted.
Graph showing competition metrics for top of page rate over time. It displays data for advertisers including solar-estimate.org, ecowatch.com, consumeraffairs.com, and understandsloar.org, with the user's performance highlighted.

Next, you must ask yourself, Why are these numbers so wildly different from the campaign overview?” Could it be due to an underperforming Ad Group that is wildly bringing down your total average? The answer is no; they’re trying to confuse you. It wasn’t until just recently that I discovered that the campaign overview setting started not to match the detailed settings (but in a positive way for advertisers, as now we can see the more accurate impression share by campaign, maybe?!) Check this out. You see CC: NJ Solar Wizard with a top impression share of 1.51% from the campaign overview page. When you click into the detail view, it shows 72.20%, and when you click on CC: NY Solar Wizard, it shows 83.04%, not 4.15%. These are radical differences, and the conversion rate between these metrics is unclear. No matter how many assumptions I made to try and find the math behind this madness, the only conclusion was to trust my instincts and keep the CPC lean and mean.

Overview of a search campaign for NJ Solar Wizard, displaying key performance metrics including average CPC, cost, spend, and top of page rate. The campaign status is enabled with a daily budget of $100. Optimization score is 80%, and the bid strategy is set to maximize clicks.
Overview of a search campaign for NY Solar Wizard, displaying key performance metrics including average CPC, cost, spend, and top of page rate. The campaign status is enabled with a daily budget of $100. The optimization score is 18.4%, and the bid strategy is set to maximize clicks.
Overview of a search campaign for NJ Solar Wizard, displaying key performance metrics including average CPC, cost, spend, and top of page rate. The campaign status is enabled with a daily budget of $100. Optimization score is 80%, and the bid strategy is set to maximize clicks.

The next important topic for Microsoft is setting up your conversions. As previously mentioned, Microsoft does not use G4, so once you setup an account, the first step is to create a UET tag and place it inside of your GTM (Google Tag Manager). Next, you will recreate your conversions, remembering to set attribution fairly (counting each IP only once) over a 30-day period of time.

Finally, double-check all of your campaign settings. A very common occurrence is that extensions will not carry over from your GoogleAds campaign, or the location settings might have shifted. For example, a default setting showing proximity around a zip code might have been added, which would show your ad to users not inside your desired locations. So, let’s talk imports.

Importing Campaigns from Google

Remember, importing does not equal syncing! If you’ve done the work in Google, there’s no need to double up and start from scratch to rebuild your campaigns in Bing. However, you have to be meticulous in double-checking your settings once you have imported campaigns from Google. Importing campaigns is more convenient than anything else. In taking advantage of convenience, we must also be diligent in tying up the loose ends that Bing leaves all over the place.

There are a few settings that, regardless of whether you check the box in Bing, the platform will more often than not ignore that command. Particularly, the box that defaults to checked for ‘Update Bids’ will still sync your bids with Google’s platform after the import is complete. Users must revisit their campaign settings once the import is complete to adjust the Max CPC bid in Bing.

One of the trickier settings (that cost our client almost $1,500 outside of their targeted locations).

Here’s the process to follow when importing campaigns from Google: click on custom schedule and, in the drop-down, select ‘Once Now’ (the default setting here sets up an automated import daily, where, if the account were updating to Google bids on a daily basis, we’d run into the same issue I had with Precis all those years ago); scroll down and click on Customize Bids, unchecking both of the settings available under that menu (reminder: it is imperative you double check the bids on your campaigns once you’ve imported campaigns); go into Advanced Settings at the bottom of the page and decide if you’re going to import all existing campaigns in the Google account or just specific ones; Uncheck boxes to ‘Update Bids,’ ‘Update Bid Strategies,’ click the dropdown menu for ‘Other Options’ and, most importantly, check the box at the bottom of the page that says ‘Do not expand unsupported location targets.’ Our client, Mirasol Solar, targets several locations in the state of Florida, but not the state of Florida itself. One of our unsupported locations in Bing expanded to the entire state and cost a pretty penny by default because of this setting.

Episode 16 – Featured Guest Heather Wagner

By |2024-12-05T01:18:28+00:00June 14th, 2024|Author, Podcasts|

Join us this week as we welcome Heather Wagner, Book Planner and Ghostwriter. Heather shares her secrets to creating content that resonates. Don’t miss her insights as we prepare for the launch of my book, “The Covert Code.”

Heather Wagner, Book Planner and Ghostwriter, latest guest on The Covert Code Podcast, sharing secrets to creating resonating content and insights on 'The Covert Code' launch.Meet Heather Wagner

Heather Lehr Wagner, Director of Bayberry Creatives, has twenty years of experience in publishing and content creation. She is the author of numerous nonfiction books for YA and middle-grade readers, including biographies of explorers, global leaders and activists, and series that explain how the U.S. government works. She has served as an editor for Random House and Taylor & Francis, a ghostwriter and book planner for Forbes Books and Advantage Media, and created content for use in college and graduate school curriculum and online learning.

Episode 15 – Featured Guest Meghan West

By |2024-12-05T01:22:57+00:00June 7th, 2024|In-Person, Podcasts|

Join us this week as we welcome Meghan West, former CEO of Mastercam. Meghan discusses her experience working in the manufacturing sector, building a family business to success on a global scale, and managing its transition after Sandvik bought it.

Meet Meghan West

Meghan West, CEO of CNC Software, smiling and wearing a black blazer.Meghan West earned her BS in Business from Bentley College and an MBA in Management from Hawaii Pacific University. Growing up around CAD/CAM, she gained valuable job experience both inside and outside the manufacturing industry. In 2009, she officially joined CNC Software as Operations Manager. Her exceptional leadership skills and dedication to the field were recognized in 2014 when the Society of Manufacturing Engineers named her one of the “30 Under 30 Future Leaders of Manufacturing.” In 2015, Meghan was named President of CNC Software, leading the company to new heights. Meghan resides in Hawaii with her husband and two children, where she continues to inspire and contribute to the manufacturing industry.

How Much Is a New Customer Worth to You?

By |2024-12-01T03:17:05+00:00June 4th, 2024|Forbes Articles|

One of the most difficult questions my clients wrestle with is, “How much is a new customer worth to you?” A customer’s value isn’t static. It can shift based on economic factors like GDP or inflation and also as your business model evolves.

It’s a challenging question, but one that you absolutely must be able to answer in order to strategically set a marketing budget and evaluate a campaign’s success. That means being able to identify a metric that you’ll use to know how much you’re willing to spend to acquire a new customer. Keep in mind that the metric may need to be revisited from time to time.

I like to identify a customer’s worth in two parts:

  • Initial contract value or average cart price.
  • The lifetime value of that customer, which consists of recurring revenue-potential services like software, subscriptions, professional services, upsell opportunities, and referrals. For example, if you’re selling a commodity like tissues, the initial value of a new customer buying a box isn’t much. Still, the lifetime value of a loyal customer who will purchase your brand over the next twenty years adds up.

The next step is to ask yourself, “Out of all the opportunities I have to sell products or solutions, what percentage of the time do I ‘win’?” This number becomes your conversion rate.

Now, the fun begins. How much money does your business want to make this quarter or this year? With some simple math, you’ll be able to determine how many leads you’ll need to achieve your goals based on current knowledge.

Here’s an example: Based on my current website traffic and sales processes, I know that, out of 100 leads received in Q3, we can acquire 10 new customers, or 10%, and they will generate $100,000 in new business. So, how much am I willing to spend to acquire those 10 customers? If I’m comfortable spending $1,000 per customer at the current conversion rate, that would allow marketing to spend $100 per qualified lead.

Once you have that metric in place, you’ll want to determine the appropriate marketing mix to generate those 100 qualified leads. One of the most common mistakes businesses make is evenly distributing their total marketing budget over a specific period of time.

For example, if you have $10,000 to spend in Q3, it might be tempting to budget $3,333 per month to achieve your goals. In many industries and with many target audiences, that strategy does not produce the exceptional sales you want but instead creates what’s called “the threshold of indifference.”

In my book, The Covert Code: Mastering the Art of Digital Marketing, I talk about the importance of impression sharing and critical mass messaging to propel you past this threshold. Frequency matters. If your company isn’t targeting the right audience with enough impressions over a short period of time, you’ll never be “relevant.” Your ads will be overlooked or simply forgotten.

The better strategy is to front-load your marketing efforts, with the goal of reaching scale by driving as much high-quality traffic to your site as possible and then allocating funds toward robust remarketing.

Marketing professionals know that “it takes 7x to sell.” With so much competing noise in a consumer’s daily journey, your messaging needs to be compelling and frequent to ensure that you’re moving the audience through the purchase funnel.

The good news is that, with the advent of programmatic digital marketing, business owners now have the flexibility to achieve their goals at a fraction of the cost of traditional marketing by targeting the right customer at the right time with the right message.

With the correct tools, a realistic target, and the flexibility to pivot when necessary, you can ensure that your digital marketing is strategic and successful.

And it all starts with knowing how much your customer is worth.

Episode 14 – Featured Guest Ashton Cudjoe

By |2024-12-05T01:31:26+00:00May 31st, 2024|In-Person, Podcasts|

Join us this week as we welcome Ashton Cudjoe, the Founder of Hawaii Medical College. Ashton shares his journey in medical education, the innovative approaches his college takes, and the future of healthcare training.

Ashton Cudjoe, Founder of Hawaii Medical College and the latest guest on The Covert Code Podcast, shares his journey in medical education, innovative approaches, and the future of healthcare training.

Meet Ashton Cudjoe

Ashton Cudjoe is the CEO of Hawaii Medical Institute and Owner of Ashton Business Advisors, with an impressive background in education and leadership. He holds an MBA from the University of Phoenix and a Bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Sciences from the City University of New York—Brooklyn College. Ashton has also studied at Stanford University Graduate School of Business. His expertise spans coaching, strategic planning, public speaking, and management consulting, making him a prominent figure in both the medical and business fields. With a passion for entrepreneurship and instructional design, Ashton is dedicated to shaping the future of healthcare education and leadership development.

Go to Top